Serbian genocidal madman Mladic arrested

Was he really the monster they say? I never questioned anything I heard growing up about the events in Serbia during the early 1990's. I was in high school then, and had no reason to question anything that I learned. While reading about Mladic, I stumbled on to this article about Srebrenica:

http://serbianna.com/analysis/archives/158

I've never read a counter-point to the official report before. It's like one of those things you don't dispute, that everyone takes for granted, and that you would be branded a racist or cruel bastard for wondering if the stories are all they seem to be.

I don't know what happened. Who does? But it's something to see an alternate version of the events. As in most cases where a major military operation ends with the complete destruction of the enemy, the bloodlust rarely stops when the soldiers stop fighting. Would the story have been the same if the opposition forces reversed the battle?

Is it a massacre because the soldiers who lost and the side that was ravaged and raped belonged to our allies? Or would we overlook the atrocities of the people we supported with arms and money?

Just some things to think about.

Why is the DOW down today? Let's throw darts to figure it out.

Seriously, guys, get your stories straight.



If you want to invent a reason for the stock market dropping, make up your FOOCKING MINDS.

That's all, just felt like putting that out there.